The burden of proof is a foundational concept in the legal system. It determines which party must prove its claims and how strong that proof must be. Whether a case involves personal injury, a contract dispute, or criminal charges, the burden of proof plays a critical role in how courts decide cases.
Understanding how the burden of proof works can help individuals better comprehend lawsuits, insurance claims, and courtroom outcomes, particularly in the aftermath of an accident or injury.
The burden of proof refers to the legal obligation a party has to establish the truth of its claims or defenses. In most cases, this burden falls on the party that brings the claim, often referred to as the plaintiff (in a civil case) or prosecutor (in a criminal case).
Meeting the burden of proof requires presenting evidence that satisfies a specific legal standard. If the party with the burden fails to meet that standard, the court or jury may rule against them, regardless of the opposing party’s arguments.
In civil cases, such as personal injury lawsuits, the plaintiff typically has the burden of proof. This means that the injured party must demonstrate that the defendant’s actions directly caused their injuries and damages.
In criminal cases, the burden of proof rests entirely on the prosecution. The defendant is not required to prove innocence. Instead, the prosecution must prove every element of the alleged crime.
In some situations, the burden can shift. For example, once a plaintiff establishes certain facts, the defendant may then have the burden to prove an affirmative defense.
Not all cases require the same level of proof. Courts apply different standards depending on the type of case.
This is the most common standard in civil cases, including personal injury claims. A party meets this burden by showing that its version of events is more likely true than not. In practical terms, this means proving something has a greater than 50 percent chance of being true.
Most personal injury cases in Wisconsin are decided under this standard.
This higher standard requires proof that is highly and substantially more likely to be true than false. It is used in certain civil matters, such as cases involving fraud, punitive damages, or specific equitable claims.
Clear and convincing evidence demands a stronger level of certainty than a preponderance of the evidence but less than proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
This is the highest standard of proof and applies only in criminal cases. The prosecution must prove the defendant’s guilt to such a degree that there is no reasonable doubt in the minds of the jury.
Because the consequences of a criminal conviction are severe, the law imposes this strict burden on the government.
In a personal injury case, the injured party generally must prove several key elements:
Evidence may include medical records, accident reports, witness statements, photographs, video footage, and expert testimony. Insurance companies often challenge whether the plaintiff has met this burden, particularly on issues like causation and damages.
Failing to meet the burden on even one required element can prevent recovery.
Yes, in some cases. While the plaintiff usually carries the initial burden, certain defenses can shift part of the burden to the defendant.
For example, if a defendant raises an affirmative defense such as comparative negligence, they may need to present evidence showing the plaintiff contributed to their own injuries. Their degree of fault can affect the final outcome of the case.
Even when the burden shifts, each party must still support its claims with evidence that meets the applicable legal standard.
The burden of proof often determines the strength of an injury claim. Accident victims may believe fault is obvious, but courts and insurers rely on evidence, not assumptions.
Understanding who must prove what—and how—explains why documentation, timely medical treatment, and thorough investigations matter after an accident. It also helps explain why similar cases can have very different outcomes based on the available evidence.
One common misconception is that the injured person automatically wins if they were hurt. In reality, injuries alone do not satisfy the burden of proof. The evidence must connect those injuries to another party’s negligence.
Another misunderstanding is that the burden of proof never changes. Typically, the plaintiff must first prove their case, but this can change depending on certain legal defenses or facts that are discovered.
Legal standards—such as the burden of proof—can significantly impact the outcome of an injury claim. Understanding how evidence is evaluated and which party is responsible for proving key facts is an important part of protecting your rights. Eisenberg Law Offices, S.C. has over 140 years of combined experience and has recovered more than $100 million in compensation for accident victims. For more information, contact our experienced Madison personal injury lawyers today or call (608) 256-8356 to schedule a free consultation.
Get a free consultation.
No obligations.
